Adobe Acrobat File:conclusion.pdf

This document is a text-only version of the original Adobe Acrobat file. Graphics and formatting may be lost in the conversion from pdf to html.

View the Adobe Acrobat version of this file.


                                                                                                                                        


tion, as in all lakefront redevelopment                                                    Public Participation 
projects. Finally, passive recreational      Conclusion                                     
areas and wetlands would be greatly                                                        As a sub-plan building on the ideas put 
enhanced with interpretive nature trails     The Future                                    forth in the City's Master Plan adopted 
and boardwalks.                                                                            in 1997, the public participation com-
                                             The plan outlined above is designed to        ponent of this document can be traced 
Funding Sources                              serve as the conceptual framework for         directly back to the numerous surveys, 
                                             projects which may or may not ulti-           interviews and questionnaires com-
Because Fisherman's Landing was de-          mately resemble those presented in this       pleted as part of the Master Planning 
veloped using Federal grant monies,          document. This is due to the knowledge        process. It should be noted that the City 
any relocation of the facility would         that absent a port authority or other su-     of Muskegon won the Michigan Soci-
have to take place pursuant to a cum-        preme planning body, development ac-          ety of Planning Officials (MSPO) 
bersome and lengthy land conversion          tivities will be carried out individually     award for the public participation com-
process. Under this process, the exist-      by private property owners.  While ef-        ponent of its Master Land Use Plan in 
ing site could not be sold until a new,      forts to involve individual property          1998. 
comparable site was secured. In addi-        owners in the planning process proved,         
tion, an alternative funding source          in most instances, to be effective, these     The planning process resulting in this 
would have to be used to rebuild the         individuals may not always agree on           specific document began in earnest in 
permanent facilities existing on the pre-    every aspect of the plan, or the means        late summer of 1998. At that time, a 
sent site (i.e. restrooms, docks etc.)       necessary to carry it out.                    broad-based coalition of business and 
                                                                                           community leaders known as the Lake-
Funding for the interpretive trails, and     As Muskegon continues to experience           front Development Task Force ap-
natural habitat enhancement measures         the type of development pressure al-          proached the City of Muskegon, and 
could come from a variety of sources         luded to in the introduction, it will be-     requested that City staff join ranks with 
previously mentioned, especially             come apparent that the planning proc-         them in creating a plan that would 
Coastal Zone Management Grants, and          ess will need to be fluid and adaptable       serve as a rough blueprint for future 
Great Lakes Fisheries Trust Funds            to exigent and complex circumstances.         waterfront development activities. Over 
(CMS).  Funding for the building of          In short, the plan should be taken in its     the ensuing months, City staff along 
new facilities at a relocated Fisher-        "spirit", and not its "letter".               with the task-force, began to develop 
man's Landing, could come from                                                             preliminary graphics that were subse-
agreements exacted from private devel-                                                     quently published in the Muskegon 
opers in exchange for the sale of  the                                                     Chronicle. Although initial comments 
existing Fisherman's Landing site.            


                                             Waterfront Redevelopment Sub-Plan 46 



                                                                                      


were few, the plans were generally well 
received. 






























                                            Waterfront Redevelopment Sub-Plan 47 



                                                                                       


A series of individual meetings with 
selected property owners was held over 
a period of approximately four months 
followed by a  general meeting of a ma-
jority waterfront property owners on 
April 1, 1999. The comments being 
generally favorable, a tacit  endorse-
ment to proceed with the planning pro-
gram was received by City staff.  
 Plan Adoption 
 Before the plan is officially adopted, 
the draft plan will undergo a lengthy 
public comment period during which 
time, the general public will be invited 
to critique the plan, and its component 
projects. Finally, the plan will be the 
subject of a public hearing before being 
adopted by the City's Planning and 
City Commissions. 













                                             Waterfront Redevelopment Sub-Plan 48